4,646
edits
Article 15: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
After consideration of all the factors, the commander makes their decision/findings. These include:<br> | After consideration of all the factors, the commander makes their decision/findings. These include:<br> | ||
(1) dismissal with or without warning. This action normally is taken if the commanding officer is not convinced by the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offense, or decides that no disciplinary measure is appropriate in light of his past record and other circumstances. Dismissal, whether with or without a warning, is not considered NJD, nor is it considered an acquittal;<br> | (1) dismissal with or without warning. This action normally is taken if the commanding officer is not convinced by the evidence that the accused is guilty of an offense, or decides that no disciplinary measure is appropriate in light of his past record and other circumstances. Dismissal, whether with or without a warning, is not considered NJD, nor is it considered an acquittal;<br> | ||
(2) referral to a court-martial, or pretrial investigation under Article 32, SFUCMJ;<br> | (2) referral to SF Judge Advocate General's Corps for a court-martial, or pretrial investigation under Article 32, SFUCMJ;<br> | ||
(3) postponement of action (pending further investigation or for other good cause, such as a pending critical mission or war-time engagement); or<br> | (3) postponement of action (pending further investigation or for other good cause, such as a pending critical mission or war-time engagement); or<br> | ||
(4) imposition of NJD.<br> | (4) imposition of NJD.<br> | ||